OREANDA-NEWS. Fitch Ratings assigns the following ratings and Rating Outlooks to Wellfleet CLO 2016-1, Ltd./LLC:

--$2,000,000 class X notes 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;
--$97,500,000 class A notes 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable;
--$130,000,000 class A loans 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable.

Fitch does not rate the class B, C, D, or E notes or the subordinated notes.

TRANSACTION SUMMARY

Wellfleet CLO 2016-1, Ltd. (the issuer) and Wellfleet CLO 2016-1, LLC (the co-issuer) comprise an arbitrage cash flow collateralized loan obligation (CLO) managed by Wellfleet Credit Partners, LLC (WCP). Net proceeds from the issuance of the secured and subordinated notes will be used to purchase a portfolio of approximately $350 million of primarily senior secured leveraged loans. The CLO will have an approximately four-year reinvestment period and a two-year non-call period.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Sufficient Credit Enhancement: Credit enhancement (CE) of 35% for the class A notes and class A loans (collectively, the class A debt), in addition to excess spread, is sufficient to protect against portfolio default and recovery rate projections in an 'AAAsf' stress scenario. The degree of CE available to class A debt is lower than the average CE of recent CLO issuances; however, cash flow modeling indicates performance in line with recent CLO issuances. Class X notes are expected to be paid in full from the application of interest proceeds via the interest waterfall by the second payment date.

'B+/B' Asset Quality: The average credit quality of the indicative portfolio is 'B+/B', which is in line with that of recent CLOs. Issuers rated in the 'B' rating category denote a highly speculative credit quality; however, class X notes and class A debt are unlikely to be affected by the foreseeable level of defaults. Class X notes and class A debt are projected to be able to withstand default rates of up to 88.4% and 63.6%, respectively.

Strong Recovery Expectations: The indicative portfolio consists of 97.7% first lien senior secured loans. Approximately 92.3% of the indicative portfolio has strong recovery prospects or a Fitch-assigned Recovery Rating of 'RR2' or higher, and the base case recovery assumption is 79.6%. In determining the class X notes and class A debt ratings, Fitch stressed the indicative portfolio by assuming a higher portfolio concentration of assets with lower recovery prospects and further reduced recovery assumptions for higher rating stresses, resulting in a 40% recovery rate in Fitch's 'AAAsf' scenario.

RATING SENSITIVITIES
Fitch evaluated the structure's sensitivity to the potential variability of key model assumptions including decreases in recovery rates and increases in default rates or correlation. Fitch expects the class X notes and class A debt to remain investment grade even under the most extreme sensitivity scenarios. Results under these sensitivity scenarios were consistently 'AAAsf' for the class X notes and ranged between 'A+sf' and 'AAAsf' for the class A debt.

Fitch published an exposure draft of its Counterparty Criteria for Structured Finance and Covered Bonds on April 14, 2016. The exposure draft serves as the operative criteria report for this ratings analysis. Under the exposure draft, a direct support counterparty is expected to maintain a long-term rating of at least 'A' or a short-term rating of at least 'F1' in order to support note ratings of up to 'AAAsf'. The issuer's account holder, U.S. Bank N.A., satisfies the minimum expected ratings threshold for a direct support counterparty under the exposure draft framework.

Fitch's existing counterparty criteria (dated May 14, 2014), as well as the issuer's governing documents, expects this role to be fulfilled by an institution with a long-term rating of at least 'A' and a short-term rating of at least 'F1'. U.S. Bank's long-term rating currently meets this expectation. Therefore the rating recommendation for each class of debt remains achievable under Fitch's existing criteria.

The framework regarding expectations for qualified investments has not materially changed between the existing criteria and the exposure draft.